My mom was born in the 20’s. There were a lot of expectations around how she would act, what she would do with her life. She met those expectations, as most women did. I don’t think she was all that happy or fulfilled. Many women of her generation were not. I’m sure there were high points for her. Feeling empowered wasn’t one of them.
I was born in the 60’s. Things for women were different by then, and changed even more by the time I was growing up in the 70’s and 80’s. My mom watched the generation between hers and mine, saw the opportunities they were creating for themselves and for other women, the apparent plethora of choices they were carving out. She wanted those choices — for me. Like many women my age, I grew up to a chorus of “You can have anything you want. You can do anything you want.” I took that message in, absorbed it, made it part of me. I heard it from my mother, from my father, from my grandparents, from my teachers. My friends heard and lived the same message. With little variation, we did what was expected, never wanting to disappoint those who worked so hard to make sure we had those opportunities. So, we took school seriously, we dated boys who were enlightened and honoured our stellar futures, we went on to postsecondary education, we delayed marriage, we started our careers and bought our houses before beginning our families, we nurtured our careers, earned our promotions, followed the social issues, donated to the progressive charities, hired the childcare, earned as much as or more than our husbands, pushed against the glass ceiling, talked the talk, walked the walk. We had everything, did everything, exhausted ourselves fighting the good fight, achieving the good life. One thing we / they forgot though … we somehow missed out on some of the original intention — choice.
I followed the rules, lockstep. I didn’t follow the only possible path — I get that. There were variations I could have chosen. I could have gone to grad school and done the rest of it 5 years later. 10 years in, I could have divorced my man who would have turned out to be not such a supporter of feminism after all. Basically, though, I followed the rules. That’s how it felt — what we were really good at was the same thing our mothers were good at — following rules. This particular set of rules was about emancipation not subservience, but they were set expectations, nevertheless. It took me a long time to figure that out. Don’t get me wrong; I was grateful for the opportunities provided by those expectations and by the women who trailblazed to create them — I still am. But here I am, 42, and living in a box that is roomier and has better views than the one that contained my mother… but a box even so.
So… one night this week, I will meet Him. For four or five hours, I will accept a new set of rules, where I call him Sir, and he calls me pet, and I kneel, and he ties me up, and I shiver, and he spanks. The difference is that they will be rules that he and I negotiated together, and they will be all about feeling good and escaping, about fucking and being fucked, about pleasing and being pleased. It will be between him and me, and afterwards, I’ll write about it graphically and maybe poetically, and I’ll brag about the limits I pushed, and the boundaries I crossed, and all of it will be my choice. Mine.



As you say, feminism is ultimately about choice. Even those “Surrended Wives” who give their husbands control over their lives are only able to do so because feminists have given them an alternative. Just embrace the progress that’s been made since your mother’s time, and make the most of it.
Oh, wait – you already are.
By: cyranoq on February 9, 2008
at 9:34 am
Giving over control of my day to day life isn’t something I could do… it’s too built in for me to want to make decisions for myself. My natural desire to fight against the dictates of others, though, makes me ready to defend the choice of women who want that. As you say… having the alternatives available, for all of us, is what it’s about.
By: Marianne on February 9, 2008
at 9:44 am
Thank you for that. I think too many people think choice is only a surrender.
By: Z on February 9, 2008
at 3:16 pm
I think it’s about more than choice, it’s about discovering who you are, finding some important essence inside you. The beauty is that now you have made a choice for a world in which your nature can blossom. your surrender is given, not taken, as you so eloquently explain. you are a lovely writer.
By: Larkin on February 9, 2008
at 4:26 pm
Sometimes it makes sense to fight. Sometimes it makes sense to surrender. Either way, if it’s done on *your* terms, all the better.
A
By: Alex on February 9, 2008
at 11:46 pm
Z, sometimes it can seem like that, I think, when you’re told, “You’re lucky to have a choice — now here’s the way you have to choose”.
Larkin — Thank you, Sweet Commenter.
Alex — Right… it’s the context, and the intention, I think, that are important.
By: Marianne on February 10, 2008
at 8:50 am
Marianne, I like this post a lot because it puts things in a real, historical context. And you make some great points about the constraints of a supposedly liberating system. Philosophically, I suppose I could say that any supposedly liberating system has constraints … aren’t there always “rules,” even to that new game you’re playing? But the other side of that coin is that there is always choice, and that’s the side you choose to embrace. Good for you; I hope you’ll be happier.
Interestingly, I just wrote a post about the problematic nature of feminsm and its constraints, and the nature of choice. You seem very bright (I just found your blog) and I’d be grateful for your thoughts, if you’d care to take a look?
By: Marcelle Manhattan on February 10, 2008
at 10:48 am
Marcelle — You make a good point about the fact that change, even for the good, usually brings with it new constraints of some kind. There is no question that I simplified the issue greatly — I think I was trying to show more of a visceral reaction to being told what I must do in order to prove that I am liberated and have choices. The inherent contradictions are missed so frequently. On the other hand, I left out almost all reference to the reasons why things are as they are, and the necessity of imposing change sometimes. It’s a very complicated issue.
The other complication, for me, was writing this, and risking leaving the impression that my choice is full-time submission. It isn’t — it’s just one of the ways I want to be able to play, without negating my choice to do that and / or anything else I want.
I will definitely take a look at your post, Marcelle. Thanks!
By: Marianne on February 10, 2008
at 12:37 pm
What a great post. It’s true so true, about the first generation after feminism really caught on. I hope, and it seems like, the children of your generation get that though, we get choice, and I hope that that is our strength in pushing feminism forward.
I’m glad you found your choices though.
By: whatsername on February 19, 2008
at 12:29 pm
Thank you, W — you’re right… my hope is for young women, those in their twenties now… I hope that they embrace all choice, and don’t try to impose on themselves and their peers one way of being a woman.
By: Marianne on February 20, 2008
at 9:09 pm
Found this via a post on Natty’s Spanking Blog.
Just wanted to say, “Very nicely put.” I think that all the times I was told “you can do anything if you only try hard enough” as a child were well meant.
However, it was as though by telling me “you can do anything” there was also this failure to acknowledge the realities of class, race, and yes, gender. This notion that I could do “anything” never fully fit into this world, where oppression continues to exist.
And then, meeting up with the people who are caught up in addressing past oppressions, but can’t bring themselves to change one essential belief: that there *is* no one right way to do things. They trade the old, bad way for some way that is new (and, obviously since it’s opposite, then it’s also good).
So I got flack as a graduate student in history for not choosing to write about African American history, because that was a betrayal of my race, and a slap in the face to all the people who worked so hard for civil rights. I get negative responses as someone more or less choosing to be a housewife, because it’s like a slap in the face of all the people who fought for women’s rights.
I guess the proof that there has not been a class revolution in this country is tied to the fact that I get very little pressure to write the history of poverty, or to do whatever class-coded behaviors people fighting for the rights of the poor would identify with success of that movement.
Well, as my verbosity indicates, this was a really thought-provoking post for me, and I’ll be coming back to read more. Thanks!
By: jigsawanalogy on March 21, 2008
at 11:32 pm
It’s interesting, Ms. Jigsaw — since writing this post I’ve done a lot more thinking about the whole issue of those who purport to be our spokeswomen trying to oppress us as much as we ever were in the past. It really does anger me that now, at a point in history when we should be celebrating what has been earned, and the choices that accompany it, instead we’re walking on eggshells constantly. Are we afraid it will all be taken back? Or is it just an extreme form of black and white thinking, as you’ve described? If we aren’t actively fighting in the way “they” believe is the only way, then we must be betraying the movement? I’ve always easily gotten my back up when someone tells me how I must think, how I must be and act. But wasn’t that the point of feminism… not having to be and do things that weren’t right for me? I always believed that the women who fought and fight for my right to choose would be proud that I’m now making those choices for myself. Naive me.
Thank you for sharing your experiences and thoughts here.
By: Marianne on March 22, 2008
at 9:01 am